I'm not a scientist but this article got a really valid and good point. I only know about this Ruby-lib within the scientific context: http://www.wedesoft.demo

I'm not a scientist but this article got a really valid and good point. I only know about this Ruby-lib within the scientific context: http://www.wedesoft.demon.co.uk/hornetseye-api/files/HornetsEye-txt.html http://www.wedesoft.demon.co.uk/hornetseye-api/files/Hornets... One thing that hit me though. The author of the article maybe should consider a little effort. I mean...libraries for scientists should probably be developed by scientists (the target group), which means it's an excellent opportunity for the ones that identify the problem to get something started. No code falls down from heaven. Supply and demand.