4 ms·
There's lots of Gmail love going on, here and in the comments on the original post. But notice the first few sentences of the post: "I have in my computer eve
by rwl 16y ago
There's lots of Gmail love going on, here and in the comments on the original post. But notice the first few sentences of the post:
"I have in my computer every e-mail message I have sent or received since 1992. Minus the obvious spam, this database comes to about half a million messages..."
Gmail does not provide a local archive of mail messages, across the shifts in providers, mail clients, and addresses that occur over a couple of decades of using email. Gmail has some nice features, no doubt (I do use it myself), but it isn't a be-all, end-all email solution, particularly for those who need or would like to keep their email under local control.
Gmail's spam filtering is great, but it doesn't work 100% of the time. Some spam slips through to my inbox; what's worse, I have noticed a variety of false-positives (e.g., regular emails from mailing lists that I often delete but occasionally read aren't spam), meaning that I still must give the Spam folder a once-over before I delete its contents.
And, as far as I know, Gmail's spam filtering algorithm is proprietary. This means that the only way to get it is to route your email through Google, and accept the attendant trade-offs of doing so. Regardless of whether that works for you, it isn't a sustainable solution to spam to tell people to "just use Gmail."
I would much prefer to see a new Internet email protocol evolve, maybe something like what's described by this commenter (http://www.cringely.com/2010/11/the-decline-and-fall-of-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-38525 http://www.cringely.com/2010/11/the-decline-and-fall-of-e-ma...). Basically, if we move to a new standard protocol where something like the features of PGP are mandatory, then building (and filtering mail by) a distributed web of trust will become much easier. ISPs will migrate to this protocol because it will reduce their load and provide a better experience for their customers; et voila, we will have overcome the network effects hurdle that currently makes PGP essentially useless.
- phirephly 16y agoI don't quite understand what you mean by Gmail having no way to locally archive email. I use POP to locally cache all of my email on all my computers.
- rwl 16y agoTrue, it can be done; I didn't mean to imply that it couldn't. This certainly isn't the "default" way to use the service, though. But the little bit of extra work one has to do in Gmail to get local access to your mail is simply one trade-off. The real point is that using Gmail involves a variety of trade-offs, which many email users may not be able to or may not want to make. So "just use Gmail" is not a sufficient answer to the problem of spam.