> Flynn (security advisor for a couple of day) -- was setup Uh...ok. Citations, please. That's quite an outlandish and unsupported claim. > There was no collu

> Flynn (security advisor for a couple of day) -- was setup Uh...ok. Citations, please. That's quite an outlandish and unsupported claim. > There was no collusion with Russia to change 2016 election outcomes, that Flynn was accused of. Flynn was talking to the Russian ambassador during the transition, promising to lift sanctions that the then-President was imposing. He was convicted for lying to FBI agents about that. Perhaps there's an innocent explanation for the incoming National Security Advisor lying to the FBI about secret conversations with the Russian ambassador to undermine the acting President during the transition. I'm curious what that might be. > Roger Stone did not have his day in court, and the allegation were are not about directing Foreign powers to do anything. Note how at no point did I mention Roger Stone. > Roger Stone did not have his day in court, and the allegation were are not about directing Foreign powers to do anything. Also not a thing I mentioned. > The other indictments had nothing to do with 2016 election and happened for offenses outside 2016 election activities. Al Capone was convicted on taxes. Let's read the report.