5 ms·
I think you are purposefully ignoring facts, so that high level sentences match your narrative. Flynn (security advisor for a couple of day) -- was setup. Ther
by 75dvtwin 8y ago
I think you are purposefully ignoring facts, so that high level sentences match your narrative.
Flynn (security advisor for a couple of day) -- was setup.
There was no collusion with Russia to change 2016 election outcomes, that Flynn was accused of.
"... made materially false statements and
omissions during an interview with the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") on January 24,
2017, in Washington, D.C. "
[1]https://www.justice.gov/file/1015126/download https://www.justice.gov/file/1015126/download
that's not collusion.
Roger Stone did not have his day in court, and the allegation were are not about directing Foreign powers to do anything.
Certainly hiring a foreign agent to write a document to be used trigger for FBI to initiate opposition party surveillances (like Clinton orchestrated) -- would have been a worthy avenue for Mueller to pursue, if he was about justice
The other indictments had nothing to do with 2016 election and happened for offenses outside 2016 election activities.
--- ---
In general, my definition of deep state is:
a shadow government (consisting of elected officials and hired bureaucrats), that performs illegal activities, but blames opposition exact same things they are guilty of.
Whether it is collusion with foreign powers to orchestrate a coup, or abuse of women, or anti-Semitism, or racism, launder money through charities, or get bribes for political favors.
The fact that left-wing media had zero interest in investigative reporting of the deep state, and the true collusions with foreign powers to orchestrate coup in this country --- in an indication of their actual profession (paid propagandists).
- lamarpye 8y agoWell said.
- alchemism 8y agoMoney laundering through charities you say? Blaming the opposition for the same things they are guilty of, you say? Well now, to me that is interesting. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/nyregion/ny-ag-underwood-trump-foundation.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/nyregion/ny-ag-underwood-...
- abrahamepton 8y ago> Flynn (security advisor for a couple of day) -- was setup Uh...ok. Citations, please. That's quite an outlandish and unsupported claim. > There was no collusion with Russia to change 2016 election outcomes, that Flynn was accused of. Flynn was talking to the Russian ambassador during the transition, promising to lift sanctions that the then-President was imposing. He was convicted for lying to FBI agents about that. Perhaps there's an innocent explanation for the incoming National Security Advisor lying to the FBI about secret conversations with the Russian ambassador to undermine the acting President during the transition. I'm curious what that might be. > Roger Stone did not have his day in court, and the allegation were are not about directing Foreign powers to do anything. Note how at no point did I mention Roger Stone. > Roger Stone did not have his day in court, and the allegation were are not about directing Foreign powers to do anything. Also not a thing I mentioned. > The other indictments had nothing to do with 2016 election and happened for offenses outside 2016 election activities. Al Capone was convicted on taxes. Let's read the report.
- int_19h 8y agoLying to FBI is one thing Flynn pleaded guilty of, as part of his deal. But there were other charges, such as working for Turkey without registering as a foreign agent - the deal is pretty much the only reason why Flynn got out of it, by giving them enough evidence to convict his co-conspirators. And while it's not Russia, it is still very much relevant to 2016 election, since Flynn's participation in the scheme happened while he was already the national security adviser for the Trump campaign.