3 ms·
> I for one, enjoy hearing someone's critical thinking about the architecture underneath the skin of a building. As in, the systems and processes that structure
by whack 8y ago
> I for one, enjoy hearing someone's critical thinking about the architecture underneath the skin of a building. As in, the systems and processes that structure space and movement and interaction and emotion and society
The article contains none of that. As another commenter perfectly described: this piece doesn't seem to make any coherent argument. Nowhere does she explain why she dislikes it aesthetically.
- cam_l 8y agoAesthetics is not architecture! Not sure how much clearer i can be. Talking about architectural aesthetics is like discussing the success of Amazon or Google by way of the colour palette of their website. The articles argument is about the underlying processes which spawned and support the building. It is one valid criticism.