4 ms·
Not that two wrongs make a right, but isn't that what happened to begin with? Or did they go to SF voluntarily? In any case, the legal argument was that Nevada
by dTal 8y ago
Not that two wrongs make a right, but isn't that what happened to begin with? Or did they go to SF voluntarily?
In any case, the legal argument was that Nevada had a duty of care. It's not about "rounding them up", it's about the state of Nevada providing them with shelter and psychiatric care. Which presumably, they would do in Nevada.
- justboxing 8y ago> but isn't that what happened to begin with? Or did they go to SF voluntarily? Correct. They didn't come to SF voluntarily. Since they had mental issues, most (if not all) didn't even know what was happening to them. It's the most cruel thing to do.