4 ms·
Well, he is in charge of this system. Why would he reply? He knows exactly what they do and how shady it is.
by bufferoverflow 8y ago
Well, he is in charge of this system. Why would he reply? He knows exactly what they do and how shady it is.
- dang 8y agoThat crosses into personal attack, which is not ok here. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, you'll notice that the rules include Assume good faith.
- maccio92 8y agoWe can assume good faith, but when bad faith has been demonstrated we should not turn a blind eye
- dang 8y agoWhat people consider "demonstrated" depends greatly on how they feel about a thing. We're asking users to err on the side of assuming good faith. That's not easy, so if you're not making a strong conscious effort to do it, you're probably not following the guidelines. (I mean anybody, of course—not you personally.)
- bufferoverflow 8y agoWhat's the good faith scenario in this case? Even hypothetically? The CEO isn't aware of how the system (he is in charge of) works?
- dang 8y agoSure. I'm in charge of HN and I don't know how all its systems work. And there are plenty of other scenarios you could imagine if you wanted to assume good faith.
- bufferoverflow 8y agoSorry, I'm not buying that scenario. This is not some obscure internal system.
- dang 8y agoNevertheless, please assume good faith when commenting here. All our defaults point us in the opposite direction. It takes a conscious effort to counteract that, and the survival of this community depends on it.