I'm simply saying that modern C++ is not safe (and it will probably never be). If you write C++ at scale, you need to accept that you're going to ship memory sa

I'm simply saying that modern C++ is not safe (and it will probably never be). If you write C++ at scale, you need to accept that you're going to ship memory safety bugs. I've said many times there is a legitimate reason to write C++. If you understand you will be shipping memory safety issues, but the advantages of C++ outweigh the memory safety issues that you will ship to production, then I can't argue with that. I've seen game developers argue as much, and that's legitimate! Maybe, for your use case, memory safety problems really don't matter (or don't matter enough to outweigh C++'s other features). But it doesn't do anyone any good to sugarcoat the fact that C++ at scale virtually always ends up with memory safety problems, and while there have been many mitigations there has been no effective solution so far.