3 ms·
If you have an ARIN allocation, there is no reason you would ever want to decrease the amount of addresses you own. You own them.
by zylent 8y ago
If you have an ARIN allocation, there is no reason you would ever want to decrease the amount of addresses you own. You own them.
- def8cefe 8y agoWhether you own them or not is subject to a lot of debate and not clear cut. If you owned them, why would you need to fool ARIN into believing they are being utilised? The agreement you make to get an allocation requires a certain level of utilization depending on the size of the block to prevent squatting and exhaustion of resources. This is a good thing, and if it was actually respected we wouldn't be in a mad rush to migrate to IPv6.
- rwbhn 8y ago"Mad rush" - heh. I'd hate to see how long something rolled out at a leisurely pace would take!
- y4mi 8y ago> IPv6 is intended to replace IPv4. In December 1998, IPv6 became a Draft Standard for the IETF, who subsequently ratified it as an Internet Standard on 14 July 2017 it only took 20 years to standardize after all. we're seriously rushing here!