3 ms·

> Nazis don't exist. They used to, before most of us were born, but they don't exist any more. So what's the term for a bunch of white guys shouting "Jews will

> Nazis don't exist. They used to, before most of us were born, but they don't exist any more. So what's the term for a bunch of white guys shouting "Jews will not replace us" while holding swastika, iron cross, and Nazi eagle symbols?

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
apostacy 8y ago
The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200. I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game".[1] Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0
- btreecat 8y ago
  >The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. Role playing Nazis, by choice. And this wasn't a historical reenactment, or even a skit/play. This was an attempt at showing fear through symbology and crowd size. You seem to sympathize with them in a very odd manor. >They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. LOL I see what you pathetically tried to do there. Please explain, what's so friendly and cuddly about people who's ideology involves extermination of other humans. >The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200 Not sure what you mean, feel free to clarify. >I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game" So because one news outlet was wrong one time, we should now disregard all reporting from any outlet till the end of time. Got it. >Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat. You are an expert on what defines a serious threat now too! So in your clearly expert opinion (/s) what is the definition of a "serious threat?"
annieboo 8y ago
Cosplay.
annieboo 8y ago
Cos-play.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

apostacy 8y ago

The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200. I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game".[1] Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0

btreecat 8y ago
>The term I would use is: 4chan users engaged in Live Action Role Playing. Role playing Nazis, by choice. And this wasn't a historical reenactment, or even a skit/play. This was an attempt at showing fear through symbology and crowd size. You seem to sympathize with them in a very odd manor. >They were trying to spook you, and they did, apparently. LOL I see what you pathetically tried to do there. Please explain, what's so friendly and cuddly about people who's ideology involves extermination of other humans. >The most they could muster from the entire world is < 200 Not sure what you mean, feel free to clarify. >I remember when the media tried telling us about how "Anonymous" were "hackers on steroids" who treated things like a "real life video game" So because one news outlet was wrong one time, we should now disregard all reporting from any outlet till the end of time. Got it. >Yes, there are some creeps out there. But they are not a serious threat. You are an expert on what defines a serious threat now too! So in your clearly expert opinion (/s) what is the definition of a "serious threat?"

annieboo 8y ago

Cosplay.

annieboo 8y ago

Cos-play.