3 ms·
My point is, blatantly saying "X need not apply" isn't any worse than saying "this opportunity is open to both X and Y" and then only accepting Y. Implicit disc
by jakelazaroff 8y ago
My point is, blatantly saying "X need not apply" isn't any worse than saying "this opportunity is open to both X and Y" and then only accepting Y. Implicit discrimination isn't somehow better than explicit.
- pacala 8y agoIf I read this correctly, what you're saying is: * Implicit discrimination is bad. I'm saying: To use that as a guide for your actions you need to have an implicit discrimination detector able to account for all the confounding variables. * Explicit discrimination is also bad. I'm saying: As a corollary, there should not be explicit 'X need not apply' policies. * Two wrongs make a right.