4 ms·
At least it gives an opening to someone else to try to fill the need if it was useful.
by sct202 8y ago
At least it gives an opening to someone else to try to fill the need if it was useful.
- O1111OOO 8y ago> someone else to try to fill the need There aren't many Google Products that I really missed (or even used) that are on that suspicious site[0] (and echoed by a news source w/o verification) except for Reader. You are right: for Reader, someone didn't just fill the need, many different someones filled that need. Honestly didn't miss a beat when Reader was shut down. The alternative, non-BigTech solutions, have been awesome. [0] I say suspicious because the coder acknowledges that he created the site out of anger over Inbox. As a result, he has lost objectivity and it shows.