4 ms·

A NY Times article will make Google love him more. You know, a link bank / mention of URL from a high "PR" site. Bugger just got away with more of what he was

• jrockway 16y ago
  I did the Google searches mentioned in the article and did not find anything with the word "decor" in it on the first page of results.
  • llimllib 16y ago
    I did as well, and he was on the front page. http://img.skitch.com/20101128-f4iwgixrk3wi3pyxudw73r53xe.medium.jpg http://img.skitch.com/20101128-f4iwgixrk3wi3pyxudw73r53xe.me...
    • Matt_Cutts 16y ago
      Part of the problem is that [christian audigier glasses] is a difficult query. Why? Because most of the content on christianaudigier.com is about clothes. There's only a few pages about glasses, and even those pages don't seem to have the word "glasses" on them. Instead, they almost exclusively use the word "sunglasses." Here's the search results for [christian audigier sunglasses] for example: http://www.mattcutts.com/images/christian-audigier-glasses.png http://www.mattcutts.com/images/christian-audigier-glasses.p... As you can see, the official website has three of the top four results in that case. In essence, you're asking [brandname X] to return brandname.com when the word X doesn't actually appear anywhere on site. That's fundamentally a hard query. We have made progress on queries like that, and certainly folks at Google are talking about how to do better on such queries in the future.
• deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]