3 ms·

FWIW the companies responsible for those ads are Taboola, Outbrain, and Revcontent. I posted one especially egregious example last week on r/adops: https://www

by alecb 8y ago

FWIW the companies responsible for those ads are Taboola, Outbrain, and Revcontent. I posted one especially egregious example last week on r/adops: https://www.reddit.com/r/adops/comments/b0n57e/its_embarrassing_to_see_these_ads_on_prominent/ https://www.reddit.com/r/adops/comments/b0n57e/its_embarrass...

dwighttk 8y ago
those are why I use ad blocking (hadn't heard of revcontent but def taboola and outbrain) Man, yesterday I read a New York Times article in a view without ad blocking... I was actually embarrassed for them as a company. It's difficult to read an article when there are so many ads that there's doubt as to if there is more article below the next raft of ads.
runn1ng 8y ago
Huh, you are right. Those scummy links at Washington Post are all Outbrain. I was mistaken then (because they use BOTH Google and Outbrain)
- tyingq 8y ago
  Google often has scummy ads as well. Haven't checked recently, but the ads on http://getpaint.net http://getpaint.net are often designed to look like download buttons to download the popular paint application. Scummy AdSense ads are harder to pin down, of course, because of the live bidding and personalization.
  - penagwin 8y ago
    Just check (3/22/19) and yup sure enough https://i.imgur.com/6SMBjDa.png https://i.imgur.com/6SMBjDa.png . I find this is pretty common with many software websites that have ads, I'm really surprised paint.net doesn't switch to carbon or something. EDIT: There's another one at the bottom of the page too. And they're randomized, some make it clear you aren't downloading Paint.net (such as the "Free Mac PDF Reader") but others aren't at all.
    - blntechie 8y ago
      Why don't developers put a thick border with 'Advertisement' in bold around the ad space so that ads displayed doesn't look like they are native elements?
      - tyingq 8y ago
        Because then they make less money.
- ahoy 8y ago
  It's fairly common for large media sites to use multiple ad vendors. WaPo isn't unique here.
VirtualAirwaves 8y ago
I clicked but I still don't know who's #1 on Hillary's list.

by alecb 8y ago

dwighttk 8y ago

those are why I use ad blocking (hadn't heard of revcontent but def taboola and outbrain) Man, yesterday I read a New York Times article in a view without ad blocking... I was actually embarrassed for them as a company. It's difficult to read an article when there are so many ads that there's doubt as to if there is more article below the next raft of ads.

runn1ng 8y ago

Huh, you are right. Those scummy links at Washington Post are all Outbrain. I was mistaken then (because they use BOTH Google and Outbrain)

tyingq 8y ago
Google often has scummy ads as well. Haven't checked recently, but the ads on http://getpaint.net http://getpaint.net are often designed to look like download buttons to download the popular paint application. Scummy AdSense ads are harder to pin down, of course, because of the live bidding and personalization.
- penagwin 8y ago
  Just check (3/22/19) and yup sure enough https://i.imgur.com/6SMBjDa.png https://i.imgur.com/6SMBjDa.png . I find this is pretty common with many software websites that have ads, I'm really surprised paint.net doesn't switch to carbon or something. EDIT: There's another one at the bottom of the page too. And they're randomized, some make it clear you aren't downloading Paint.net (such as the "Free Mac PDF Reader") but others aren't at all.
  - blntechie 8y ago
    Why don't developers put a thick border with 'Advertisement' in bold around the ad space so that ads displayed doesn't look like they are native elements?
    - tyingq 8y ago
      Because then they make less money.
ahoy 8y ago
It's fairly common for large media sites to use multiple ad vendors. WaPo isn't unique here.

VirtualAirwaves 8y ago

I clicked but I still don't know who's #1 on Hillary's list.