A little bit more than a decade AGO, but OK. > We should be applauding [..] instead of condemning them Why does it have to be either? We can condemn this mist

A little bit more than a decade AGO, but OK. > We should be applauding [..] instead of condemning them Why does it have to be either? We can condemn this mistake, while applauding their security efforts. These efforts were already known. They are not the news. The fact they felt the need to be as defensive as they are (with non news) is telling for me. Why apply damage control when there's no urge for it?