3 ms·
To each their own. I support that. It's quite possibility that they too find it baffling to see the ridiculous attitude that and some western country have towa
by matz1 8y ago
To each their own. I support that.
It's quite possibility that they too find it baffling to see the ridiculous attitude that and
some western country have toward marijuana.
They have every right to decide for themselves to make marijuana "evil", whatever the reason is.
- scbrg 8y agoTo each their own is a reasonable philosophy when you apply it to individuals. It's not quite so reasonable when you apply it to countries, as countries are anything but a 100% homogeneous set of individuals. Perhaps some people in Korea don't think marijuana is evil. Maybe some people in Korea don't like being effectively forced to drink themselves senseless every day. Heck, maybe some Saudi Arabian gays would prefer not to be executed - but to each [country] their own I guess, hmm?
- matz1 8y agoYes, but the parent post is specifically talking about countries so 'To each their own' I'm using is in the context of countries. A country in relation of other country. Of course if you drill down within a country then the context of 'To each their own' is within its individual.
- icebraining 8y agoI don't see anyone advocating taking away their decision.