You might as well tell them, "Tough shit." Different markets and different languages, etc. don't deserve automatic accommodation, but if you fully believe in ac

You might as well tell them, "Tough shit." Different markets and different languages, etc. don't deserve automatic accommodation, but if you fully believe in accommodating disabled people in order to give them the dignity and humanity they deserve, then you'd take on the moral imperative to make an effort at accessibility. Maybe it shouldn't be a legal requirement for private-market web documents, but dismissing it altogether is not a morally defensible position. Would the ADA have ever been passed under the principles you're espousing?