He appears to be talking (in this article at least) more about spirituality than religion. I think it's hard to dispute his basic point: you cannot prove a neg

He appears to be talking (in this article at least) more about spirituality than religion. I think it's hard to dispute his basic point: you cannot prove a negative (or as he phrased it, "the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"). I do find it kinda odd to hear those who profess to a spiritual belief ragging on those who profess a belief in the contrary though. Neither of them has evidence.