4 ms·
Consider the possibility that they are wiser, having been through some hard times, and might like to leave a functioning economy for the younger generations.
by tropo 8y ago
Consider the possibility that they are wiser, having been through some hard times, and might like to leave a functioning economy for the younger generations.
- magduf 8y agoYou're not going to have a functioning economy with the massive climate problems that are coming, along with the Boomer's refusal to invest in infrastructure. If you look at how the Boomers vote, all they care about is the "invading" "Mexicans", abortion, and lower taxes for rich people. Basically, they're a bunch of greedy racists who vote to shoot down any attempt to improve the economy through things like better taxation of the class that can afford to pay more taxes, and better infrastructure for all of us. No, they're not wiser at all, and they haven't been through any hard times. You're thinking of their parents who went to war in WWII. Those people are mostly dead now. The Boomers are their spoiled, greedy children, who are mostly to blame for the state of this nation now.
- tropo 8y agoI think the 1973 oil crisis and the 1979 oil crisis both count as hard times. You seem to wish that the Boomers would vote for a self-inflicted oil crisis. It's also hard to keep the lower class employed with a living wage if low-cost migrants keep underbidding them for employment. While the Boomers haven't always made great decisions, this us-vs-them thinking neglects that the Boomers generally care about their descendants. Boomers do not wish to see their grandchildren suffering.
- magduf 8y ago>It's also hard to keep the lower class employed with a living wage if low-cost migrants keep underbidding them for employment. Then maybe the Boomers should vote for higher taxes and better social services. That's what advanced nations do, after all, and they don't have these problems.