3 ms·
>And the consequence is that everyone is better off holding currency than investing it. Which is disastrous for the economy. This is FUD. The US experienced de
by logicchains 8y ago
>And the consequence is that everyone is better off holding currency than investing it. Which is disastrous for the economy.
This is FUD. The US experienced deflation through much of the 19th century, yet saw higher growth rates then than in the 20th century. For instance, from
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040715/were-there-any-periods-major-deflation-us-history.asp https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040715/were-there-a... (don't have time to find a more formal source): "The period between 1873 and 1879 saw prices drop by nearly 3% per year, yet real national product growth was almost 7% during the same time." And overall "the price level (the average of current prices across the entire spectrum of goods and services produced in the economy) was actually 50% higher in 1800 than it was in 1900." So clearly it's possible to have strong economic growth during deflationary times.
- ucaetano 8y agoDon't copy-paste your reply :) But again, you are confusing deflation with deflationary currency.