7 ms·
Of course it’s legal and there are numerous language proficiency tests. I don’t see what the problem with that could possibly be, just like requiring a candida
by stingraycharles 8y ago
Of course it’s legal and there are numerous language proficiency tests.
I don’t see what the problem with that could possibly be, just like requiring a candidate to have a certain amount of proficiency in Python.
- foldr 8y agoRequiring "native fluency" could be interpreted as requiring the candidate to be a native English speaker, which would obviously be discriminatory. That's probably not the intent, but it's a bad choice of wording. If they mean "as fluent in English as a native speaker", then that's arguably much too high a standard.
- jessaustin 8y agoOne wonders about the "fluency" of whoever wrote that requirement...
- rsweeney21 8y agoEnglish was always my worst subject. :)
- jessaustin 8y agoHa! If you decide to change it, I would just drop the "native". (IANAL)