5 ms·
> and damages the environment for decades if not more Though apparently radiation is not as bad for the flora and fauna as people are: “Wildlife is thriving a
by perilunar 8y ago
> and damages the environment for decades if not more
Though apparently radiation is not as bad for the flora and fauna as people are:
“Wildlife is thriving around Chernobyl since the people left”
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28281-wildlife-is-thriving-around-chernobyl-since-the-people-left/ https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28281-wildlife-is-thr...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Sabinus 8y agoAnimals and plants don't care as much about higher infant mortality, cancers or lower lifespans as humans do. Plus the cumulative effects of radiation are less deadly than human predation and habitat destruction.