The article spends too much time saying what not to do and not enough time saying what to do instead. People treating p-values dichotomously are doing so becaus

The article spends too much time saying what not to do and not enough time saying what to do instead. People treating p-values dichotomously are doing so because they think that's what they're supposed to be doing. So while it's amusing to rant as in this article, it should have devoted its efforts to a presentation of exactly how a paper should be written in this new age. I suppose there's plenty of opportunity for others to do that, but this seems high profile.