> It is obviously troubling to see self driving cars run into solid and stationary objects, but human drivers do that all the time too. The question shouldn't b

> It is obviously troubling to see self driving cars run into solid and stationary objects, but human drivers do that all the time too. The question shouldn't be whether this technology is perfect, it should be whether this technology is safer than humans I fail to understand this line of reasoning. Are you saying because humans tend to run into solid objects it is okay if the self driving cars do it, only if it does less times than humans?