2 ms·
That's assuming he's always able to intervene before it kills him. The argument is that he may not always be able to or prevent AP from behaving erratically e
by atomicUpdate 8y ago
That's assuming he's always able to intervene before it kills him. The argument is that he may not always be able to or prevent AP from behaving erratically enough that results in killing someone else (while he saves his own life).