3 ms·
It's not so much how much CPU each takes up, but that 'make' will waste some time recompiling stuff that doesn't need to be recompiled. Ninja is better about re
by maccam912 8y ago
It's not so much how much CPU each takes up, but that 'make' will waste some time recompiling stuff that doesn't need to be recompiled. Ninja is better about reusing stuff compiled the first time to make the second compilation faster but still accurate.
- coherentpony 8y agoIsn't the point of `make` that it doesn't build stuff that doesn't need to be rebuilt? Am I missing something?
- swuecho 8y agoI guess make and ninjia use different algorithm to compute the targets that does not beed to rebuild.