no I'm just saying that average is not good enough. imagine lung cancer for example, if we take average then it's 6% risk taking smookers and not smookes, but

no I'm just saying that average is not good enough. imagine lung cancer for example, if we take average then it's 6% risk taking smookers and not smookes, but if I decided not to smoke then it's 0.2%. so in this case I can do better for lowering the chances then when I would accept some other solution that would let us all have it at 5% witch might seem ok but not for me.