3 ms·
Yes, I'm disagreeing with the claim that it's interesting. Interestingness isn't entirely subjective. Mostly, though, I'm sticking up for the kid, whose sub-150
by benatkin 8y ago
Yes, I'm disagreeing with the claim that it's interesting. Interestingness isn't entirely subjective. Mostly, though, I'm sticking up for the kid, whose sub-1500 rating shouldn't be scoffed at by any chess player who's more than, say, 10 years old.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- mbrameld 8y agoDid you maybe misread the first comment you replied to? What exactly is it you're saying isn't interesting?