4 ms·
> I disagree. Was there an edit to the OP I missed? What are you disagreeing with exactly? It was clearly a statement of opinion about how they found it intere
by tbrake 8y ago
> I disagree.
Was there an edit to the OP I missed? What are you disagreeing with exactly? It was clearly a statement of opinion about how they found it interesting.
You couldn't just elucidate more on the reasoning for the classifications, you had to first tell them they were wrong and then pedantically explain it.
Peak fucking HN commenting.
- benatkin 8y agoYes, I'm disagreeing with the claim that it's interesting. Interestingness isn't entirely subjective. Mostly, though, I'm sticking up for the kid, whose sub-1500 rating shouldn't be scoffed at by any chess player who's more than, say, 10 years old.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- mbrameld 8y agoDid you maybe misread the first comment you replied to? What exactly is it you're saying isn't interesting?