5 ms·
> what they think is offensive. This is not a a daily instance of "he says", "she says" offensiveness. This is an act of terror, and these platform served as a
by fourier_mode 8y ago
> what they think is offensive.
This is not a a daily instance of "he says", "she says" offensiveness. This is an act of terror, and these platform served as a propaganda media which ought to stopped.
- post_break 8y agoSo who determines that I can't see this video? Who determines what ISIS videos I should watch from live leak, twitter, etc? Should I be able to see the atrocities that are happening in Brazil? Who watches the watchmen?
- aeternus 8y agoIs the manifesto also considered propaganda media? What about analysis of that manifesto, or discussions about how to prevent attacks like this based on the contents of the manifesto, especially if they contain excerpts? Should we ban security companies from using the video for training purposes or to design better security or anti-terror measures? Should we ban people from sharing the attacker's name? Should we ban news agencies from even reporting on attacks like this? Keep in mind that news-coverage especially has been shown to incite copy-cat attacks.