3 ms·
Justifying the sole control of UIKit application distribution based on the fact that either WebKit exists or that UIKit is not implemented within a VM is illogi
by tewks 16y ago
Justifying the sole control of UIKit application distribution based on the fact that either WebKit exists or that UIKit is not implemented within a VM is illogical and irrelevant.
- thought_alarm 16y agoThere are technical realities that you obviously don't understand. Call me when Google, Microsoft, RIM, or Palm ever allow fully native 3rd-party software.
- nlogn 16y agoAndroid has allowed native code through the NDK since 1.6. Now, you have to use it in conjunction with the SDK and thus some of your code will have to be in Java, but the main reason I can see to get down to the "bare metal" anyway would be for performance critical algorithms.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- tewks 16y agoOSX on armv6 or v7 is secure enough to not warrant the use of a virtual machine. Virtual memory and memory protection were not commonly found in mobile pre-iPhone, making the choice of the JVM or dalvik in 2003, when Android was founded, or earlier in the case of RIM, convenient. Regardless, the review process as it stands provides little in the way of additional security, a fact that further weakens your vague argument. Static analysis can only go so far. The status quo is about desire for revenue, not supposed "technical realities". All I am proposing is that allowing apps from other sources would have little effect on either. Call me when Apple ever allows fully native 3rd-party software on the Mac.