> So you want to slow the spread of things that people might be interested because the things they are interested in might be bad? Yes, because for good things

> So you want to slow the spread of things that people might be interested because the things they are interested in might be bad? Yes, because for good things the present speed is not necessary and for bad things it makes needed moderation more difficult. My guess is the only people who'd even notice the slowdown would be social media junkies (as in addicted, compulsive over-users).