3 ms·
Just because they mention "licensable" doesn't imply some other category of concern that would involve "proprietary". You seem very sure of a position that not
by strictnein 8y ago
Just because they mention "licensable" doesn't imply some other category of concern that would involve "proprietary".
You seem very sure of a position that nothing you've linked has highlighted in the slightest.
They are concerned because the dominant licensable OS requires proprietary software and services, which is what the document you linked makes very clear.
- ucaetano 8y agoMake it "Apple has 100% market share in unlicensable mobile operating systems". Doesn't change the fact that it has 100% market share in that market, no matter how you call that market. You can't have your cake and eat it too: you can't defend the ECs case on Android and not demand the same on iOS. Well, you can, but then we're not talking about antitrust policy, we're talking about politics and picking winners.