3 ms·
They're going to take their discourse elsewhere. Best to just skip the whack a mole and put them in camps.
by austhrow743 8y ago
They're going to take their discourse elsewhere. Best to just skip the whack a mole and put them in camps.
- Pharmakon 8y agoBecause of course, we all know that any regulation is part of an inevitable slide to “camps”. Come on, people who argue that always seem to miss just how much power a society has to change course, which is why that slippery slope is a fallacy and not predestination. I’m not hearing people opine that “today they came for the child abusers, tomorrow the Jews.” It’s a ridiculous premise, and it both oversells the threat of any action they’re ideologically opposed to, and undersells the power we all have to either promote or fight fascism.
- quink 8y agoSure they will. I'm perfectly fine with the whack-a-mole but detain anyone who's a credible threat to the physical safety of others. I'm talking about limiting the freedom of anyone in theory talking about subjects in a way that results in physical violence or substantially harms society to the point of losing a substantial number of lives on one single private platform in large groups. I'm not talking about death camps, but the distinction seems to be lost on the crowd flitting down the slippery slope.