> second the difficulty of being confronted with an overt looked-down-upon decision that is not fully understood. But that's the point. The goal of the Free S

> second the difficulty of being confronted with an overt looked-down-upon decision that is not fully understood. But that's the point. The goal of the Free Software movement is not to get every person running free software, but to educated people on _why_ they should care, and why they should insist on running free software for themselves. Installing Ubuntu on a bunch of people's computers and saying "see how much better linux is than Windows" misses the point. I think that's the main flaw in these so called "install fests." The Free Software movement argues from a moral standpoint, not a standpoint of technical superiority. Otherwise you set yourself up for a constant back and forth of "but this thing was easier on windows." That's not the point.