4 ms·

I am not sure what else are you looking for, Spring boot/cloud has pretty much all you need to build any application.

MarkMc 8y ago
I know Spring and Spring boot are very popular, but I don't understand why. The Spring Boot home page says, "Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run"." What does that mean? What does Spring Boot give me that Tomcat doesn't?
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- sbov 8y ago
  What code are you writing that Tomcat runs? Are you coding against the servlet spec? Or are you using something like dropwizard? Tomcat is a servlet container that implements various Java EE specifications, such as the servlet spec, jsp spec, etc. Spring encompasses many different libraries. The most widely used is probably Spring MVC, which builds on top of the servlet spec to make building web applications easier. After that Spring Security is probably most widely used, which adds things like auth, CSRF tokens, etc. Spring Data and Spring Cloud are also somewhat popular. There are many more Spring libraries, but I have little to no experience with them. You can really give or take what you want here. You can use Spring MVC with Spring Data, or Hibernate, or JPA, JDBC, or whatever you want really. One place I worked used Spring MVC with home grown security and ORM layer. Spring Boot brings "convention over configuration" to Spring. Because Spring is so configurable it can take a lot of boilerplate. Spring Boot removes much of that boilerplate for certain use cases and has, generally speaking, more user friendly defaults. Spring Boot also runs off a server embedded in the jar. That's why you can "just run" it. You create a "Main" method. You can choose from several embedded servers, including Tomcat. But this isn't exactly special for Spring Boot because you could do this even if you didn't use Spring Boot.
  - MarkMc 8y ago
    Thanks - that's a good overview :) Most of my apps just code against the servlet spec with a JDBC connection to a MYSQL database, sometimes with JSP. Perhaps because most of my business logic lives on the client I've usually found that plain servlets + plain JDBC calls were sufficient Although I've found it pretty straightforward to configure servlets in Tomcat I can see that Spring MVC makes it a little easier. Maybe the introduction of a framework 'Model' is also an advantage - I'll investigate further. Regarding Spring security - would I use this package if I was implementing a "Login with Email/Password or Facebook or Google" feature to a website?
    - jacques_chester 8y ago
      One nice thing about Spring Boot is that you can mix and match. You can assemble stuff very quickly using the starters, or you can use your own stuff. Pretty much any level of abstraction is supported -- Spring Data spans the range from "thin convenience wrapper over JDBC" (JDBCTemplate) to "completely autogenerated RESTful endpoints based on JPA models" (Spring Data REST). In web land you can use raw servlets up to fully-dressed domain objects. Whatever you want, Spring can either fill in the gap or politely yield the floor. Not forgetting that dependency injection -- the original core feature -- is just the bee's knees. I work for Pivotal, but not on Spring. But I've definitely grown to appreciate it more and more over the years. I deeply miss it when mucking about in Golang.
rb808 8y ago
I only need to run a few different applications and they require very little boilerplate to get this to work. Spring just gets in the way and makes simple things complicated.

I know Spring and Spring boot are very popular, but I don't understand why. The Spring Boot home page says, "Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run"." What does that mean? What does Spring Boot give me that Tomcat doesn't?

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
sbov 8y ago
What code are you writing that Tomcat runs? Are you coding against the servlet spec? Or are you using something like dropwizard? Tomcat is a servlet container that implements various Java EE specifications, such as the servlet spec, jsp spec, etc. Spring encompasses many different libraries. The most widely used is probably Spring MVC, which builds on top of the servlet spec to make building web applications easier. After that Spring Security is probably most widely used, which adds things like auth, CSRF tokens, etc. Spring Data and Spring Cloud are also somewhat popular. There are many more Spring libraries, but I have little to no experience with them. You can really give or take what you want here. You can use Spring MVC with Spring Data, or Hibernate, or JPA, JDBC, or whatever you want really. One place I worked used Spring MVC with home grown security and ORM layer. Spring Boot brings "convention over configuration" to Spring. Because Spring is so configurable it can take a lot of boilerplate. Spring Boot removes much of that boilerplate for certain use cases and has, generally speaking, more user friendly defaults. Spring Boot also runs off a server embedded in the jar. That's why you can "just run" it. You create a "Main" method. You can choose from several embedded servers, including Tomcat. But this isn't exactly special for Spring Boot because you could do this even if you didn't use Spring Boot.
- MarkMc 8y ago
  Thanks - that's a good overview :) Most of my apps just code against the servlet spec with a JDBC connection to a MYSQL database, sometimes with JSP. Perhaps because most of my business logic lives on the client I've usually found that plain servlets + plain JDBC calls were sufficient Although I've found it pretty straightforward to configure servlets in Tomcat I can see that Spring MVC makes it a little easier. Maybe the introduction of a framework 'Model' is also an advantage - I'll investigate further. Regarding Spring security - would I use this package if I was implementing a "Login with Email/Password or Facebook or Google" feature to a website?
  - jacques_chester 8y ago
    One nice thing about Spring Boot is that you can mix and match. You can assemble stuff very quickly using the starters, or you can use your own stuff. Pretty much any level of abstraction is supported -- Spring Data spans the range from "thin convenience wrapper over JDBC" (JDBCTemplate) to "completely autogenerated RESTful endpoints based on JPA models" (Spring Data REST). In web land you can use raw servlets up to fully-dressed domain objects. Whatever you want, Spring can either fill in the gap or politely yield the floor. Not forgetting that dependency injection -- the original core feature -- is just the bee's knees. I work for Pivotal, but not on Spring. But I've definitely grown to appreciate it more and more over the years. I deeply miss it when mucking about in Golang.

rb808 8y ago

I only need to run a few different applications and they require very little boilerplate to get this to work. Spring just gets in the way and makes simple things complicated.