> Have you considered that the adversarial workplace is the reason for unionizing in the first place? It's just anecdotal but my SO was involved at her union b

> Have you considered that the adversarial workplace is the reason for unionizing in the first place? It's just anecdotal but my SO was involved at her union because she wanted to make a difference. It was at our provincial government, thus it represent 43 000 members in that case, which to me make it pretty much needed to have a union. Once at a reunion for the representative, they still had a bit of time left scheduled, so some of them suggested to go do an impromptu manifestation in front of a bank. In case it wasn't clear, the bank isn't government owned. From what she told me, a big majority of them went. Have you considered that union representative may be an interesting place for adversarial people to go, thus pushing an adversarial relation?