3 ms·
Maybe Mozilla could do with a bit less money. They've been playing serious business for some time now, but it's pretty much been borrowed feathers. Firefox go
by craigsmansion 8y ago
Maybe Mozilla could do with a bit less money.
They've been playing serious business for some time now, but it's pretty much been borrowed feathers.
Firefox got big because of early enthusiasts who believed in a better web. That got them enough clout to get google interested, and google basically gave them large piles of money.
Somehow that gave them the idea they were a "real business" now, and they started spending and reorganising themselves accordingly.
Now it turns out they probably weren't a real business after all. Those piles of google money in the bank could have sustained pure Firefox development perpetually, probably even allowed for fun and useful side-projects like Rust, but no, Mozilla wanted to play serious business, except, of course, now they have to compete against actual serious businesses, which in this case would be Google and Microsoft, and so far their efforts haven't been a unanimously successful.
> This is where the Free Software mission has faltered
No, this is 1. where Mozilla has faltered, and 2. Focusing on money, marketability, and business friendliness is pretty much an open source objective. That's fine, but don't drag Free Software into this.
- hinkley 8y agoFrom what I understand, a bunch of the long lived charities put their donations in the bank and live off of the interest. You get more donations by pretending like the money is for your new program, but it's only indirectly so (more assets equals more operating capital). If Mozilla didn't do that, their biggest opportunities for setting up and endowment are in the past and it won't go well for them in the future.
- hinkley 8y agoWell, fuck. In 2017 they operated at almost 120% of income: > Overall, Mozilla invested $24M in this work in 2017. Total revenue and income support to the Mozilla Foundation in CY 2017 was $20.6M.