4 ms·
That's a good and positive idea in regards to framing principles towards human rights. While inclusion is the antidote for exclusion, we are not faced primaril
by exodust 8y ago
That's a good and positive idea in regards to framing principles towards human rights.
While inclusion is the antidote for exclusion, we are not faced primarily with an exclusion problem. There's simply been too many religious-justified atrocities and crimes from various religions. This world's violence and crime is ridiculous, and the details of the crimes are the extreme opposite of human rights.
I was taught that superstition was unhealthy. Perhaps I was brainwashed with anti-superstitious propaganda? My main "phobia" is: religion as a force in politics and education. Religion should stick to what it's good at - peaceful prayer gatherings. I support "freedom of peaceful prayer gatherings".
What happened at the mosques in NZ - unspeakable, sickening, the work of a deranged paranoid meat-head terrorist. More violence for fictitious reasons. Too long festering in corners with other truthers, confirming each other unchallenged; combined with likely sociopathic condition. (sorry for long post, passionate issues)
- egjerlow 8y ago> Religion should stick to what it's good at - peaceful prayer gatherings. That's a pretty a pretty simplistic view, given history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role_of_Christianity_in_civilization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role_of_Christianity_in_civili...