4 ms·
I think he/she was commenting more about JIRA. Confluence is actually pretty useful.
by pcurve 8y ago
I think he/she was commenting more about JIRA.
Confluence is actually pretty useful.
- scruple 8y agoIn your opinion. My own experience with Confluence is that it's essentially write-only memory. So much documentation that goes in to my companies Confluence becomes outdated _very_ quickly, but is rarely, if ever, actually kept up-to-date. This leads to a system whereby people appear to be generating a lot of functional utility for our company and our documentation purposes but it's little more than noise when you are actually trying to find that utility.
- pjmlp 8y agoStill better than emails and office documents scattered around the internal network.
- scruple 8y agoI'll absolutely grant you that it's better than internal networks. No arguments there. I think that I do prefer e-mail, though, because, at least with Office 365 and Outlook, the search function is actually useful compared to my experiences with Confluence.
- jupp0r 8y agoDon’t forget about the search that is only ever useful when you know what’s on the page you’re searching for.
- GordonS 8y agoI do (obviously!) hate JIRA, but I just don't like Confluence. It feels like where documentation goes to die, the search function is useless, and I find myself constantly hunting for tiny little buttons and links to attachments.