4 ms·
We have plenty of regulation and government attention on the issue, and I somehow doubt Congressional pockets are being lined by the campaign contributions from
by MockObject 8y ago
We have plenty of regulation and government attention on the issue, and I somehow doubt Congressional pockets are being lined by the campaign contributions from Big Spam.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Do_Not_Call_Registry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Do_Not_Call_Registry
- bobthepanda 8y agoThe problem is that a lot of spam callers are not based in the US, and it is incredibly time consuming and expensive to prosecute spam callers outside the US. The wheels of justice work, but they don't move very quickly. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/business/irs-phone-scams-jeff-sessions.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/business/irs-phone-scams-...
- adrr 8y agoCarriers make money terminating the calls both in terms of using people’s cell minutes but all reciprocal compensation for terminating the call on their network. Carriers can get rid of it any time they want. Some even offer services to block the calls for a price like Att call protect.
- eeeeeeeeeeeee 8y agoPoliticians are not being supported by the spammers themselves, but by the telecoms that do not want to make costly changes to their network to stop or enforce this problem. This couldn’t be more obvious in our fcc chair who is basically against any kind of government regulation.
- JohnFen 8y agoAnd don't forget the little fact that the telecoms make money from providing service to the spammers.