3 ms·
It hasn't been established that it's better, only that he or she thinks it's better--and we're all trying to understand why that is. Because we're (or at least
by lodi 8y ago
It hasn't been established that it's better, only that he or she thinks it's better--and we're all trying to understand why that is. Because we're (or at least I am) 99.99% sure that it's much, much worse.
To start with, the whole thing could easily be simulated in software...
- dfox 8y agoI suspect that the main reason why it is better is UX of representing whatever you want to calculate by physical structure and tunable parameters by physical knobs.