> "...employers have to invest more in supervising low-productivity workers." why do you believe these workers are low-productivity? are they unworthy of digni

> "...employers have to invest more in supervising low-productivity workers." why do you believe these workers are low-productivity? are they unworthy of dignity and privacy as a result? why do you believe the employers are qualified supervisors? have you never had a bad manager? might it be possible that the employers have no idea how to encourage productivity, and that low productivity is induced by a coercive and surveilled work environment? so many assumptions packed into those little words...