4 ms·
To me OP comes off as a curmudgeon that won't learn how to do this more efficiently in software. There's no reason why they couldn't do it faster and more accur
by driverdan 8y ago
To me OP comes off as a curmudgeon that won't learn how to do this more efficiently in software. There's no reason why they couldn't do it faster and more accurately in software.
- gh02t 8y agoI kinda feel the same, but I'd probably put a bit more of a charitable spin on it. I can certainly see how it might be more intuitive to the OP to use an analog computer and how it might not be worth the cost of moving to a software system when this is good enough. What I would disagree with is any assertion that this is objectively the best way, and OP does acknowledge in the original thread that this isn't necessarily the overall optimal setup.