3 ms·
It's almost certainly due to your opening statement "This is a garbage non-article." Over 100 people have upvoted this story, and thus it's likely that they th
by nkurz 8y ago
It's almost certainly due to your opening statement "This is a garbage non-article."
Over 100 people have upvoted this story, and thus it's likely that they think that this is an article worth reading and recommending. You are indirectly telling them that their judgement is similarly "garbage", and they are reacting with downvotes. The contents of your objections seem reasonable to me, but if your goal is productive discourse, the overall tone of your comment off-putting. You'd probably get a better response if you found a way to offer improvements to the article without offending those who liked it.
- alexandercrohde 8y agoYeah, honestly I knew that. And that is basically how I feel, I think this article is egregious and mildly destructive to the pursuit of truth. My question was to force those downvoting to confront/concede the reality that they are downvoting because they got emotional rather that the facts at hand. Which is why I imagine none responded.