> 4 separate iPad lines, plus extra screen size variation? Yup, confusing, I agree. They could do three which wouldn't be terrible, and I'll explain why: becau

> 4 separate iPad lines, plus extra screen size variation? Yup, confusing, I agree. They could do three which wouldn't be terrible, and I'll explain why: because [cont] > How is an "Air" variant useful? the "basic" iPad went back to an older design for the display to cut costs, it has a non-laminated display that can really bother you if you are accustomed to the more recent iPad models. If they were still selling the 1st/2nd gen iPad Pro models this wouldn't be an issue, but the 3rd gen iPad Pro had a massive price jump that puts some quality of life features like a laminated display behind said price jump. Bringing the "Air" line back let's Apple have a middle tier of high quality tablets between the entry-level and (for most) overkill. Ultimately the iPad Mini remains as it always has, the 7.9" variant of the larger standard iPad (Air) Model. If Apple wanted they could simplify down to three product lines: iPad (9.7"), iPad Air (7.9", 10.5"), iPad Pro (11", 12.9"), but I guess marketing research probably suggests that keeping the Mini separate is good for product awareness.