4 ms·
I switched to DDG about two years ago. A bunch of results (20%? 30%?) are not very good, and it's not an exception. Also I know it's suppose to come down the l
by hrktb 8y ago
I switched to DDG about two years ago.
A bunch of results (20%? 30%?) are not very good, and it's not an exception. Also I know it's suppose to come down the line, but not having a filter for results of the past year is a PITA.
In my case though, Google is not very good either, I remember getting very random results (mostly focused on popular or local trends, when I'm looking for something specific) about half of the time.
In fine, I see DDG as an alternative giving access to both Google and DDG. Switching to DDG when Google was bad was not simple, the reverse is (just add a !)
- rudigergerm 8y agoSame here tried using DDG, sometimes I get nothing relevant and find myself going to back to Google, I even tired forcing myself to use bing but still the results are not just good enough.