> tech is absurdly high on the meritocratic scale. Actually I would make the distinction that tech is ridiculously far ahead of most other industries- but stil

> tech is absurdly high on the meritocratic scale. Actually I would make the distinction that tech is ridiculously far ahead of most other industries- but still very low on the scale. (if by scale we mean zero to perfect meritocracy) Networks matter a huge amount and are dominated by a certain class and racial demographic. At least we've begun the conversation and I believe truly meritocratic success is very possible, but those on the inside are definitely more likely to be successful that those outside. (really specifically raising a certain kind of seed or early venture funding, where some normal business metrics may be missing- (investing in the founders) )