3 ms·
I think this is perhaps a serious design flaw with the plane. Boeing wanted to make the 737 more fuel efficient, but they didn't want to re-certify the frame,
by blackrock 8y ago
I think this is perhaps a serious design flaw with the plane.
Boeing wanted to make the 737 more fuel efficient, but they didn't want to re-certify the frame, and design a new body. So, they put bigger engines on the wings. This sounds simple enough.
Except that the engines were too powerful for the frame to handle. So on take off, these extra powerful engines would push the nose of the plane up, to such an extreme angle that it could cause the plane to stall, and risk falling out of the sky.
In order to compensate for this, they introduced software and sensors that would mechanically adjust the flaps of the plane, in order to help "level out" the plane. This is probably ok for inherently unstable fighter jets, but for commercial aviation, a single crash is devastating.
So, this issue is not just a software defect, that can easily be fixed with code. This is a serious design flaw, where the planes are a death trap just waiting to happen. There is a mismatch between the geometric placement of the powerful engines, in relation to where it should be on the plane, in order to achieve balanced flight, without the need for software to auto-correct for an excessive nose-up pitch. It was probably only a matter of time, before sensors start to fail, and the software can no longer handle the situation.
- godson_drafty 8y agoThis is incorrect. The engines are not too powerful for the airframe. The problem is that the engines themselves create lift at high Angles of Attack, pitching the nose of the plane up. "This new location and size of the nacelle causes it to produce lift at high AoA; as the nacelle is ahead of the CofG this causes a pitch-up effect which could in turn further increase the AoA and send the aircraft closer towards the stall." http://www.b737.org.uk/mcas.htm http://www.b737.org.uk/mcas.htm