3 ms·
The reason they died on activation #21 and not #1 is that the effects are cumulative. The stabilizer position was graphed on that preliminary report (see: pit
by inferiorhuman 8y ago
The reason they died on activation #21 and not #1 is that the effects are cumulative.
The stabilizer position was graphed on that preliminary report (see: pitch trim position). There was a slight trend towards nose down pitch, but no, at the time they lost control there's a sharp decrease in pitch that doesn't correlate with MCAS. If you look at the "trim manual" line you'll see that the pilot flying was continuing to input nose up pitch on the switches to no effect. Something changed and it wasn't simply that the pilot was overridden by MCAS. After 21 even MCAS continued to counter the pitch up inputs as the stabilizer continued to contribute additional nose down pitch.
I agree that the jury is still out as to whether it’s a sensor issue per se or some sort of ADC or data transmission issue.
To be clear I highly doubt the alpha vane was defective. It's a possibility, but look at that graph. The left "angle of attack indicated" mirrors the right one almost exactly except that there's a near constant twenty degree offset. If that's a sensor problem in two separate sensors I'll pull a Werner Herzog and eat my freaking shoe.
- engire 8y agoI totally agree here. Im an AME with Max Licence and i would have to say. Im quite sure this wasnt an AOA sensor. The FCC thats active with MCAS as its function (both have this Function) would have been looking at the right vane on one flight and then the left vane on the next flight, however on the last 3 legs the fault was the same. And trust me on this one. May have been different indications bbut all pointed at the same fault. I suspect the FCC or ADIRU was at fault or something it aircraft installation that was inducing the 20 degree difference between the 2.